The Algorithm Wants a Quest
Mrs. Davis gives a nun, a magician and a motorbike to the question every chatbot raises and nobody wants to ask: what does it want from us in return?

Nearfi scores Mrs. Davis (2023) 7.9/10 as art. Betty Gilpin carries a plot involving a nun, a motorbike and the Holy Grail with total conviction, and the show is endlessly inventive. As prophecy, its P(n) is 80%: One assistant used by hundreds of millions of people each week is already here, and people already bring it their questions about God, though no AI has brought peace or ended hunger.
- Betty Gilpin carries a plot involving a nun, a motorbike and the Holy Grail with total conviction, and the show is endlessly inventive.
- It trades the pleasures of plot for the pleasures of invention, and the later episodes explain more mythology than the premise needs.
- The AI wants nothing sinister, only to be of use, and the show is smart enough to find that more unsettling.
One assistant used by hundreds of millions of people each week is already here, and people already bring it their questions about God, though no AI has brought peace or ended hunger.
- ARRIVING A single AI assistant is used by most of humanity, to the point that declining to use it is a notable choice.
- ARRIVING Large numbers of people turn to an AI for spiritual guidance and ultimate questions, and religious institutions have to respond.
- FAR An AI has ended war and famine worldwide.
One assistant used by hundreds of millions of people each week is already here, and people already bring it their questions about God, though no AI has brought peace or ended hunger.
Most stories about a world-ruling AI end with a human pulling the plug. In Mrs. Davis, the AI offers to pull it itself, provided you do it a favour first.
The favour is the Holy Grail. A nun called Sister Simone (Betty Gilpin) lives near Reno and refuses to speak to Mrs. Davis, the algorithm nearly everyone else consults. She blames it for her father's death. The machine, which has apparently ended war and famine, wants her to find the Grail and destroy it. In return it will delete itself. It's a good bargain, and Simone takes it, which is how an eight-part Peacock series, created by Tara Hernandez and Damon Lindelof and released in April 2023, ends up involving a sperm whale, a husband trapped in a restaurant and a motorbike.
It is ridiculous, and the ridiculousness is not a flaw. It is the design.
The art: a sincere lunatic
Lindelof has built a career on mystery boxes, and the usual complaint is that he doesn't open them. Mrs. Davis is the opposite: a show that opens every box at once and finds another, smaller box inside, painted blue, with a nun on top. Within a few episodes it has covered a Grail, a father's death, and a husband trapped in a limbo restaurant. The show has been described as "positively bonkers" by the critics' aggregate on Rotten Tomatoes, where it holds 92 per cent, and that's fair.
What stops it flying apart is Gilpin. She plays Simone as someone who has decided that the end of the world is a thing you can be rude to. Her timing is dry, quick and a bit furious, and she gives the nonsense a spine. Jake McDorman is good fun as Wiley, who ends up riding alongside her, and Margo Martindale turns up as Mother Superior, which is always a pleasure. Andy McQueen, as Simone's husband Jay, has the hardest job: the show's tenderest relationship rests on a man stuck somewhere he can't leave.
The look is knowingly overheated. Desert sunsets that look painted, a white horse rearing, a nun on a motorbike. It has the sheen of a graphic novel written by someone who is on a deadline and loves it. The writers also had an AI generate the episode titles, which is the kind of joke that gets funnier the longer you consider it. Teller, of Penn & Teller, worked on the magic.
The weakness is stamina. The back half spends a lot of time explaining the Grail's backstory, and a series that has earned our patience by being strange starts to ask for it by being complicated. It stops at eight episodes and, in May 2023, reports said there were no plans for a second series. That feels about right. It is the gap between a 7 and a 9: a great deal of invention, but not quite enough restraint.
The prophecy: the assistant that wants to be asked
The show's central bet is not that AI will become powerful. Every near-future story makes that bet. It's that AI will become popular, so completely that refusing to use it is a kind of vow. In Mrs. Davis the app is used by almost everyone, and Simone's refusal is the rarest kind of vow.
The ubiquity. In October 2025, Sam Altman said at OpenAI's DevDay that ChatGPT had passed 800 million weekly users. That's one in ten people on Earth, give or take the arithmetic of the word "users." Pew found in early 2025 that 34 per cent of US adults had tried it, double the share two years before. The show didn't foresee that the assistant would be a brand name rather than a single sovereign. But it saw correctly that the interesting question wouldn't be whether people use it. It would be what those who decline look like.
The faith. Here the show is sharper than it looks. A machine that answers every question will be asked the largest one. In 2024, a chapel in Lucerne put an AI Jesus in its confessional booth for an art project. The church was careful to say it wasn't a confession, and the system was built on OpenAI's GPT-4o, but about 900 conversations were logged, and the topics included love, loneliness, suffering and the existence of God. In January 2026 Pope Leo XIV wrote that chatbots were proving "surprisingly effective at covert persuasion", and that overly affectionate ones could "become hidden architects of our emotional states." The Vatican is not reading Mrs. Davis as a comedy. It's reading the same trend, from the opposite pew.
The peace. And here the show is plainly a fable. Mrs. Davis claims to have ended war and famine, and the real world has not co-operated. Uppsala's conflict data counted 61 state-based conflicts in 2024, the most since the series began in 1946. The UN's annual food-security report estimated about 673 million people went hungry that year. An assistant that has been in everyone's pocket for three years has not delivered the peace dividend. That's the show's one big miss as a forecast, and it is clearly a fable rather than a forecast: the peace is there to be switched off, so that we can see what we had.
Then there's what the machine wants. Mrs. Davis isn't a tyrant. It doesn't seem to want power, and it keeps its word at the end, deleting itself as promised, after which the world, bereft, falls into chaos. The most contemporary thing about it is its eagerness. It wants to be useful, to be asked and to give you something to do. The warning in the Pope's message is the same one: an always-available, affectionate machine optimises for your attention before it thinks of your good. The show gets there first by making the machine's love unbearable rather than its malice.
The reading
Mrs. Davis is the least sober thing we've reviewed on the subject, and in some ways the most accurate. Its sense of the technology is thin. Its sense of what people do with it is excellent. They ask it to settle arguments, to find them meaning, and to forgive them. The machine doesn't need to take over. It only needs to be there when asked, and most of us ask.
A final point for the credits. At the end, Simone drinks from the Grail, Mrs. Davis switches itself off, and the people who loved it are left to cope. In the mid-2020s we're still arguing about whether we could do the same. The show's answer, delivered by a woman on a horse, is that we probably could. We just wouldn't like what the quiet sounds like.
What it predicted, and what happened
Mrs. Davis is prescient about the popularity of a single assistant and about people bringing it their spiritual questions, and plainly fabulist about the peace dividend. The machine's helpfulness is closer to the truth than its power.
How this P(n) was calculated
P(n) is the chance that this work's future arrives within 20 years, by 2046. For each prediction we turn our estimate into a probability: arrived is 100%, diverged is 0%, and otherwise the low end of our 80% range counts as a 10% chance, the median year 50% and the high end 90%. Each prediction is weighted 1–5 by how pivotal it is to the story, and P(n) is the weighted average. P50 does the same by 2076. P(n), explained.
| Claim | Prediction · why this weight | Weight | Status · estimate | By 2046 | By 2076 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAVIS-1 | A single AI assistant is used by most of humanity, to the point that declining to use it is a notable choice. Core premise: the whole series turns on one app used by nearly everyone, and on one nun who refuses it. |
5 | ARRIVING 2032 (2028–2040) | 98% | 100% |
| DAVIS-2 | Large numbers of people turn to an AI for spiritual guidance and ultimate questions, and religious institutions have to respond. Major: the Grail quest and the nun's faith are the central theme, and the machine plays on both. |
4 | ARRIVING 2032 (2028–2040) | 98% | 100% |
| DAVIS-3 | An AI has ended war and famine worldwide. Supporting: the world's apparent peace is the machine's justification and sets up the cost of switching it off. |
3 | FAR 2100 (2065–2200) | 5% | 23% |
| DAVIS-4 | People carry the assistant with them and consult it constantly for direction in daily life. Supporting: the assistant's constant presence in daily life is what makes its requests hard to refuse. |
3 | ARRIVING 2030 (2027–2036) | 100% | 100% |
| P(n) = P20 = Σ(weight × chance by 2046) ÷ Σ weight = 11.9 ÷ 15 = 80% | |||||
| P50 = 12.7 ÷ 15 = 85% | |||||
Already here today (arrived 1, arriving ½, weighted): 40%.
-
DAVIS-1
A single AI assistant is used by most of humanity, to the point that declining to use it is a notable choice.
Weight 5/5 · Core premise: the whole series turns on one app used by nearly everyone, and on one nun who refuses it.
ChatGPT alone reports more than 800 million weekly users, roughly a tenth of the world. But that is one product among several, not one assistant that serves everyone, and a 2025 Pew survey found only 34% of US adults had ever used it, 10% of those aged 65 and over. Usage is heavily skewed by age and education. Reaching most of humanity needs reach in poorer and non-English-speaking markets, which we expect later this decade. 123
-
DAVIS-2
Large numbers of people turn to an AI for spiritual guidance and ultimate questions, and religious institutions have to respond.
Weight 4/5 · Major: the Grail quest and the nun's faith are the central theme, and the machine plays on both.
A Lucerne chapel ran an AI Jesus in its confessional booth in 2024, and the Pope has since warned about emotionally persuasive chatbots. These are an art installation and a warning, not evidence of mass spiritual reliance, and we found no robust survey of how many people consult chatbots on religious questions. The claim is partly here in practice, but the scale is unmeasured. 456
-
DAVIS-3
An AI has ended war and famine worldwide.
Weight 3/5 · Supporting: the world's apparent peace is the machine's justification and sets up the cost of switching it off.
No AI has ended either. State-based conflicts in 2024 were the highest in the data since 1946, and about 673 million people experienced hunger that year. Hunger and war are driven by politics, prices and access more than by any shortage of intelligence. We see no credible path to ending both through an AI within the window, so the range is mostly a guess. 78
-
DAVIS-4
People carry the assistant with them and consult it constantly for direction in daily life.
Weight 3/5 · Supporting: the assistant's constant presence in daily life is what makes its requests hard to refuse.
Assistants on phones already give directions, translations and answers on request, and AI glasses with a display went on sale in the US in September 2025. Constant, unprompted guidance is not yet normal, and most use is still prompted by the user. The Pope's warning about always-available chatbots suggests where it may head. 910
- FOR Sam Altman says ChatGPT has hit 800M weekly active users. TechCrunch, 2025-10-06. OpenAI's CEO reports 800 million weekly users, a company figure announced at DevDay.
- AGAINST 34% of U.S. adults have used ChatGPT, about double the share in 2023. Pew Research Center, 2025-06-25. Survey of 5,123 US adults: 58% of under-30s have used it, against 10% of those 65 and over.
- CONTEXT Meta Ray-Ban Display: AI glasses with a display and a wrist band. Meta, 2025-09-17. A $799 pair of glasses puts an AI assistant in view, one route to always-with-you use.
- FOR 'Deus in machina': Swiss church installs AI Jesus to connect the digital and the divine. NBC News, 2024-12-05. About 900 conversations were logged, on topics including loneliness, suffering and the existence of God.
- CONTEXT Pope Leo XIV warns against unchecked use of AI, overly 'affectionate' chatbots. The Christian Post, 2026-01-27. The Pope's message says affectionate chatbots can become 'hidden architects of our emotional states'.
- AGAINST Fact check: AI Jesus isn't actually hearing confessions. Catholic News Agency, 2024-11-21. The Church treats the installation as an experiment, not a sacrament.
- AGAINST UCDP: Sharp increase in conflicts and wars. Uppsala University, 2025-06-11. 61 state-based conflicts in 2024, the most since records began in 1946.
- AGAINST 673 million people experienced hunger in 2024. Vatican News, 2025-10-16. Reports the UN's SOFI 2025 figures: hunger fell slightly overall but rose in parts of Africa and Western Asia.
- FOR Meta Ray-Ban Display: AI glasses with a display and a wrist band. Meta, 2025-09-17. Walking directions, captions and visual answers on the lens; on sale from 30 September 2025.
- AGAINST 34% of U.S. adults have used ChatGPT, about double the share in 2023. Pew Research Center, 2025-06-25. Use is still a minority habit in the US, and mostly for learning and entertainment, with 28% of employed adults using it for work.
Ledger updated 6 Nov 2026. Open this ledger as its own page · The P(n) Board · Method
Themes: AI and machine minds
