Novel reviewPageNF-0060

The Man With the Sulfur

Neal Stephenson's climate thriller starts with a hog hunt and ends with a drone strike, and its one clear idea is that somebody will simply do it.

Quick answer

Nearfi scores Termination Shock (2021) 7.4/10 as art. The long middle, in which one rich man's private fix to the climate becomes everyone else's diplomatic emergency, is gripping and clear-eyed. As prophecy, its P(n) is 50%: Sulfur balloons are already being launched and sold, and a funded start-up plans stratospheric test flights, but nobody has yet cooled a continent or been shot at for trying.

At a glance
As art
7.4/10
Why it scored 7.4
  • The long middle, in which one rich man's private fix to the climate becomes everyone else's diplomatic emergency, is gripping and clear-eyed.
  • The rushed, confusing finale and a cast too large for the plot leave the book's best argument without a proper ending.
  • It grasped that the hard part of solar geoengineering is the politics, and that the money for it is cheap.
As prophecy
50% P(n)
chance its future arrives by 2046 · P50 72%

Sulfur balloons are already being launched and sold, and a funded start-up plans stratospheric test flights, but nobody has yet cooled a continent or been shot at for trying.

Its most pivotal predictions
  • ARRIVING A private individual or company deploys stratospheric sulfur injection to cool the planet without international approval.
  • NEAR A state tries to stop another actor's stratospheric geoengineering programme by military force.
  • NEAR Stratospheric sulfur injection is cheap enough that a single wealthy backer or small group of states could pay for it.
Every prediction, with evidence →
Termination Shock: official artwork
7.4
Termination Shock · Neal Stephenson · 2021
Nearness
FARNEARARRIVINGARRIVED

Sulfur balloons are already being launched and sold, and a funded start-up plans stratospheric test flights, but nobody has yet cooled a continent or been shot at for trying.

A pack of feral hogs opens the book, and a man whose job is to kill them. That tells you what sort of thriller Termination Shock wants to be: one that takes its time, enjoys its logistics and trusts you to follow a very large amount of information.

Neal Stephenson's 2021 novel is set in a near future he doesn't date, in which the heat is already costing lives and the diplomats have stopped pretending the targets will be met. Its hero is a scheme. T.R. Schmidt, a Texan oil billionaire, has built a launcher on the Texas-Mexico border that fires sulphur into the upper atmosphere, to do on purpose what Mount Pinatubo did by accident in 1991. Around that scheme Stephenson arranges his people: Rufus Grant, the hog exterminator, who gets drawn in; Queen Saskia of the Netherlands, whose low country has the most to lose from rising water; and Laks Singh, a Canadian Sikh who ends up on the disputed China-India border, where much of the book's moral weight sits. Punjab, where his story begins, is among the places Schmidt's cooling would hurt: the scheme helps low-lying countries and threatens a drought in India.

The title is the sting. If a sulphur programme runs for years and then stops, the warming it was holding back arrives in a rush. Stephenson understood that this makes the thing a trap as well as a fix, and the best parts of the book are about the trap.


The art: a book that is right to be long and wrong to end

It's a very big novel (published by William Morrow in November 2021), and the first two-thirds earn that size. Stephenson is at his best when he's explaining. How would you build a launcher? Who'd sign off? What does a queen's staff actually do all day? He writes these passages the way other thrillers write chases, and they move. The slow reveal of what Schmidt has built, and why, is the best sustained sequence in the book. Chad Orzel, reviewing it on his Substack, called the build-up terrific, and he's right.

Then the plot has to land. Threads that have spent hundreds of pages in different countries are hauled together for a finale of drones and a shaft under the launcher, and it doesn't hold. The same reviewer found it "rushed and confusing and not especially satisfying", and I'd only add that the book has spent most of its length showing that it is interested in systems, so it's odd to end on a stunt. The people also stay thinner than the machinery. Rufus is a pleasure. The Queen is a good idea for a character and something less than a person. Laks is the book's heart and gets the least attention from it.

That's the gap between 7 and 8. It's the work of a writer who is brilliant at the first half of a thriller and impatient with the second.


The prophecy: the hard part isn't the sulphur

Stephenson has said in interviews that the book is about the geopolitical reaction to warming and to geoengineering, more than about the engineering. That is the right subject, and the reason the novel has aged well.

The rogue. The book's premise is that one very rich man doesn't wait for a treaty. In 2021 that looked like a thriller's convenience. It looks less like one now. Make Sunsets, a two-person US start-up, says it has launched 147 balloons carrying sulphur dioxide since February 2023 and sold 128,000 "cooling credits"; the company says its biggest balloons carry under two kilograms each. That's a pinprick, a rounding error beside a coal plant. But it was done without a licensing regime to ask, and when Mexico, where early launches took place, announced a ban on solar geoengineering experiments in early 2023, the company said its launches there were on hold. In April 2025 the US Environmental Protection Agency sent it a formal demand for information. Then, in October 2025, Stardust Solutions, a start-up headquartered near Tel Aviv, raised $60 million, taking its total to $75 million, and reported plans for outdoor experiments from a modified aircraft flying about 11 miles up as early as April 2026, though it has also said it will not run them without government approval. Schmidt is still fiction. His business plan has been tried out by people with smaller budgets.

The price. Stephenson's other bet is that it's cheap. A 2018 study by Wake Smith and Gernot Wagner put the first fifteen years of a high-altitude aircraft programme at about $2.25 billion a year on average, with around 4,000 flights in the first year. That's a sum a handful of governments, or conceivably one very rich man, could find. The book was right to say the barrier is permission and not engineering.

The block. Here the book is more optimistic than reality. It imagines a coalition of exposed countries pushing ahead. The real exposed countries have mostly gone the other way. In 2024 at the UN Environment Assembly, Vanuatu, Fiji, Colombia, Mexico, Pakistan and others supported calls for non-use of solar geoengineering, after African environment ministers had asked for a global non-use mechanism in 2023. Harvard's SCoPEx, the highest-profile attempt at a small outdoor test, was shut down in March 2024 without ever flying, after years of opposition. So the actual fight is less about who would dare, and more about whether anyone has the right.

The border. The most striking thing in the book is that India and China contest a disputed Himalayan frontier with fists and sticks, which turns out to be close to true. A 1996 agreement bars firearms near the Line of Actual Control, and in the Galwan Valley clash of June 2020 troops fought hand to hand, with 20 Indian soldiers killed. Stephenson sends volunteers from both sides to fight there with non-lethal martial arts, and makes a hero of Laks. The real version had no volunteers and no hero, only the same restraint and the same dead.

What it didn't foresee is how ordinary the argument would become. In the novel geoengineering is a sudden event. In life it has been a slow series of small, boring, legally ambiguous steps, and nobody can say which one was the decision.


The reading

Termination Shock is baggy, brilliant and badly finished, and it's the best fictional account of what it would be like to live next to somebody else's thermostat. Its prophecy is stronger than its plot. The rogue operator is here in small form, the money is easy, and the governance is exactly as missing as Stephenson feared. What hasn't happened is the scale, and the one thing that would make the title real: a programme large enough that stopping it hurts.

The book's last lesson is the one worth keeping. Nobody has to want to cool the planet for it to be done. It only needs one person with the money and no one with the standing to stop them.

The prediction ledger

What it predicted, and what happened

P50 · by 2076
72%
Here now
25%
Claims
5
Next likely arrival
2035

Termination Shock is most prescient about its politics: private actors have already released sulfur dioxide into the stratosphere on a tiny scale, funded start-ups are preparing larger tests, and no body governs any of it. Its full-scale, border-launched programme, and a state attacking it, remain well beyond anything yet seen.

How this P(n) was calculated

P(n) is the chance that this work's future arrives within 20 years, by 2046. For each prediction we turn our estimate into a probability: arrived is 100%, diverged is 0%, and otherwise the low end of our 80% range counts as a 10% chance, the median year 50% and the high end 90%. Each prediction is weighted 1–5 by how pivotal it is to the story, and P(n) is the weighted average. P50 does the same by 2076. P(n), explained.

ClaimPrediction · why this weightWeightStatus · estimateBy 2046By 2076
TSHOCK-1A private individual or company deploys stratospheric sulfur injection to cool the planet without international approval.
Core premise: a billionaire's unilateral sulfur programme is the story's engine.
5ARRIVING
2040 (2030–2065)
60%94%
TSHOCK-2A state tries to stop another actor's stratospheric geoengineering programme by military force.
Major: India's attempt to destroy the launcher drives the climax and the book's argument about sovereignty.
4NEAR
2065 (2040–2120)
20%58%
TSHOCK-3Vulnerable low-lying and small states form a coalition to push for solar geoengineering.
Supporting: the pro-geoengineering coalition around the Queen shapes the politics, though the plot turns on Schmidt.
3DIVERGED
—
0%0%
TSHOCK-4India and China contest their disputed Himalayan frontier with hand-to-hand fighting rather than firearms.
Texture: the border fights build Laks's arc but are separate from the geoengineering plot.
2ARRIVED
arrived 2020
100%100%
TSHOCK-5Stratospheric sulfur injection is cheap enough that a single wealthy backer or small group of states could pay for it.
Major: the plot only works if one rich man can afford to act alone.
4NEAR
2035 (2030–2050)
79%100%
P(n) = P20 = Σ(weight × chance by 2046) ÷ Σ weight = 8.9 ÷ 18 = 50%
P50 = 13.0 ÷ 18 = 72%

Already here today (arrived 1, arriving ½, weighted): 25%.

  1. TSHOCK-1

    A private individual or company deploys stratospheric sulfur injection to cool the planet without international approval.

    ARRIVINGCore premiseEst. 2040 · range 2030–2065Confidence: low

    Weight 5/5 · Core premise: a billionaire's unilateral sulfur programme is the story's engine.

    Small-scale private releases already happen. Make Sunsets says it has flown 147 balloons carrying sulfur dioxide since February 2023, and the EPA has demanded information from it. Stardust Solutions has raised $75 million in total and is preparing for aircraft-based tests, though it says it will not run outdoor particle experiments without government approval. Nothing yet approaches a climatically meaningful release, and the date depends on whether regulators and states act before a funded actor does. 123

  2. TSHOCK-2

    A state tries to stop another actor's stratospheric geoengineering programme by military force.

    NEARMajorEst. 2065 · range 2040–2120+Confidence: low

    Weight 4/5 · Major: India's attempt to destroy the launcher drives the climax and the book's argument about sovereignty.

    There is no precedent, and the real disputes so far are legal and diplomatic. Mexico announced plans to ban solar geoengineering experiments after Make Sunsets launched balloons from its territory, calling it a matter of sovereignty, and the EPA has pursued the same company by regulation. Force becomes plausible only if a large programme with visible regional effects exists, which depends on TSHOCK-1. The range is wide, and the event may never occur. 456

  3. TSHOCK-3

    Vulnerable low-lying and small states form a coalition to push for solar geoengineering.

    DIVERGEDSupportingNo arrival expected in this formConfidence: medium

    Weight 3/5 · Supporting: the pro-geoengineering coalition around the Queen shapes the politics, though the plot turns on Schmidt.

    The most exposed countries have so far mostly opposed it. At the 2024 UN Environment Assembly, Vanuatu, Fiji, Colombia, Mexico and Pakistan were among those supporting non-use, and African environment ministers had called for a global non-use mechanism in 2023. A pro-deployment coalition of at-risk states may still form if warming worsens, but the current alignment runs the other way, so we mark the claim as diverged in its book form. 789

  4. TSHOCK-4

    India and China contest their disputed Himalayan frontier with hand-to-hand fighting rather than firearms.

    ARRIVEDTextureArrived 2020Confidence: high

    Weight 2/5 · Texture: the border fights build Laks's arc but are separate from the geoengineering plot.

    Under agreements from 1996 and 2005, troops near the Line of Actual Control do not fire guns, and in the Galwan Valley clash of June 2020 soldiers fought with clubs, rods and stones. India later allowed commanders to authorise firearms in extraordinary circumstances. The book's organised volunteer fights are a fiction; the restraint is real but now weaker. 1011

  5. TSHOCK-5

    Stratospheric sulfur injection is cheap enough that a single wealthy backer or small group of states could pay for it.

    NEARMajorEst. 2035 · range 2030–2050Confidence: low

    Weight 4/5 · Major: the plot only works if one rich man can afford to act alone.

    A 2018 study put the first 15 years of an aircraft-based programme at about $2.25 billion a year on average, which a handful of governments or very rich people could afford. No purpose-built high-altitude aircraft exists yet, and the same study judged that existing aircraft could not do the job. Stardust expects governments to pay it over $1 billion a year. The cost is not the main barrier. Aircraft, particles and permission are. 1213

Evidence
  1. FOR As EPA Rolls Back Regulations for Large Industrial Polluters, It Finds a New Target: A Two-Person Geoengineering Startup. Inside Climate News, 2025-04-18. Make Sunsets says it has launched 147 sulfur dioxide balloons since February 2023 and sold 128,000 cooling credits.
  2. FOR Global cooling startup raises $60M to test sun-reflecting technology. E&E News, 2025-10-24. Stardust Solutions raises $60 million, $75 million in total, and plans aircraft-based particle experiments.
  3. AGAINST How one controversial startup hopes to cool the planet. MIT Technology Review, 2025-12-10. Stardust says it will not run outdoor particle tests without government approval, and no international framework exists.
  4. CONTEXT Mexico plans to ban solar geoengineering after rogue experiment. Climate Home News, 2023-01-18. A government treats a small private balloon launch as a violation of national sovereignty and responds with a ban.
  5. CONTEXT EPA Seeks Information from Make Sunsets. US Environmental Protection Agency, 2025-04-15. A regulator uses Clean Air Act powers to demand information from the balloon start-up.
  6. AGAINST How one controversial startup hopes to cool the planet. MIT Technology Review, 2025-12-10. Disputes so far run through regulation and lobbying, and researchers call for a global agreement before any deployment.
  7. AGAINST UN-Science Summit: Countries Call for the Non-Use of Solar Geoengineering. Heinrich Böll Stiftung, 2024-10-29. Reports Global South governments backing a non-use agreement.
  8. AGAINST African Countries Call for the Non-Use of Solar Geoengineering in UN Environment Assembly. Solar Geoengineering Non-Use Agreement, 2024. African states ask for a non-use mechanism; an advocacy source for non-use, so read as one side.
  9. CONTEXT Harvard shuts down geoengineering experiment. E&E News, 2024-03-19. Even the small SCoPEx test ended without a field flight after opposition from environmentalists and Indigenous residents.
  10. FOR Why Did Soldiers Use Clubs and Stones, Rather Than Guns, to Fight at the Himalayan Border?. Vice, 2020-06-18. Explains why the June 2020 clash was fought without firearms.
  11. AGAINST Ladakh clash: Indian soldiers allowed to use firearms along LAC in 'extraordinary circumstances'. Scroll.in, 2020-06-22. India loosens its rules of engagement after the clash, weakening the no-firearms norm.
  12. FOR Stratospheric aerosol injection tactics and costs in the first 15 years of deployment. Belfer Center, Harvard Kennedy School, 2018-11-28. Estimates average costs of about $2.25 billion a year and about 4,000 flights in year one.
  13. CONTEXT How one controversial startup hopes to cool the planet. MIT Technology Review, 2025-12-10. Stardust expects governments to pay over $1 billion a year for its service.

Ledger updated 5 Nov 2026. Open this ledger as its own page · The P(n) Board · Method

Cover of the William Morrow edition.

Keep reading